Update: Pfizer and Moderna Want You to Take a 6th Covid-19 Injection of their Shot with the Myocarditis/Pericarditis Warning on the Label

Dr. John Ioannidis, a Professor of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Health as well as of Statistics and Biomedical Data Science at Stanford University, examined infection fatality rates (IFRs) for the Covid-19 virus in July, 2021 and found that unvaccinated children up to age 19 have a 0.0027% chance of dying from the virus. Unvaccinated adults, between the age of 20-29, have a 0.0140% chance of dying from Covid-19. The unvaccinated in the highest Covid-19 virus risk group, between the ages of 60-69, have a 0.5900% risk of dying from Covid. In short, if you are unvaccinated and under age 69 and get Covid-19, according to Dr. Ioannidis, you have a 99.41% chance of surviving it. These are statistical numbers and they don’t differentiate between healthy or unhealthy people.

It thus comes as no surprise that MIT’s Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D, and Kathy Dopp recently concluded in their Covid-19 vaccine cost-benefit analysis study that taking the experimental, zero-liability Covid-19 injection was a deadlier choice for anyone under the age of 80. Their findings are supported by a lot of refereed science. Dr. Paul Alexander has recently posted an article titled “46 Efficacy Studies that Rebuke Vaccine Mandates” with the links to the 46 scientific studies found here.

Steve Kirsch argues the UK government’s February 2022 report should end Covid-19 vaccine mandates. The UK examined rates per 100,000 of their population between the ages of 40-80 who had taken two Covid-19 vaccines verses those who were unvaccinated. The data in the UK February 2022 report revealed that a double-vaccinated individual was more likely to become infected with the Covid-19 virus. This was true for each sub-range.

Kirsch argues: “We have all been victims of a massive fraud.” Vaccine mandates were supposed to protect people from getting the Covid-19 virus and allow us to not infect others. That was the Covid-19 vaccine promise. As it turns out, taking Covid-19 vaccines makes one more likely to get Covid-19.

The irony is painful. Kirsch also points out that although the UK report claims “a death benefit,” meaning one is less likely to die of Covid-19 if they are vaccinated, this is not true. A “death benefit” from taking Covid-19 vaccinations, according to the February 2022 UK data, is only true if all deaths caused by the Covid-19 vaccine are ignored. If the deaths caused by Covid-19 vaccines are added to the UK data, there is no “death benefit” from taking the Covid-19 vaccines. In short, we’ve all been duped by Big Pharma. Covid-19 vaccines cause more harm than good.

Dr. Paul Alexander points out the problem of vaccinating into an epidemic-pandemic with a non-sterilizing (it does not stop transmission), non-neutralizing vaccine: the result is the creation of increasingly infectious variants due to viral immune escape. Because viruses engage in the process of natural selection, Alexander argues that new variants necessarily increase in strength in order to overcome immune pressure. This logic suggests that due to immune pressure it is possible that a new viral strain will increase in strength and potentially become more lethal. Alexander argues that the CDC, NIH, Dr. Fauci and the vaccine developers know: 1) the vaccine has failed to prevent transmission of Covid-19, and, 2) the Covid-19 virus is evolving and becoming more infectious due to mass vaccination during a pandemic.

Pfizer wants you to get a 6th dose…

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, recently received emergency authorization from the FDA for those 66 years old and above to take a 4th Covid-19 shot. Bourla argued in a March 13, 2022 interview with CBS News, a 3rd shot is “not that good against infections" and “its protection is short-lived.” He’s correct. It also appears to be true for any additional boosters. A recent New England Journal of Medicine article has concluded that there is no gain in getting a fourth injection over the third injection of this non-sterilizing (it does not stop transmission) Covid-19 vaccine. There is, of course, no longterm health data on taking one mRNA Pfizer Covid-19 injection, nor is there any research on the compounding effects of taking more than one experimental mRNA Covid-19 injection.

Moderna, too…

Moderna has also received approval for a second booster (a 4th Covid-19 injection) for those age 50+ and those age 18+ with certain immunocompromises.

According to the FDA:

• A second booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine or Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine may be administered to individuals 50 years of age and older at least 4 months after receipt of a first booster dose of any authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine.

• A second booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be administered to individuals 12 years of age and older with certain kinds of immunocompromise at least 4 months after receipt of a first booster dose of any authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. These are people who have undergone solid organ transplantation, or who are living with conditions that are considered to have an equivalent level of immunocompromise.

• A second booster dose of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine may be administered at least 4 months after the first booster dose of any authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine to individuals 18 years of age and older with the same certain kinds of immunocompromise.

The FDA may authorize a 6th experimental mRNA Covid-19 shot in the fall

Although the FDA has just authorized a fourth experimental, zero-liability mRNA Covid-19 shot for the immunocompromised and anyone over age 50, it does not appear to be enough. Peter Marks, director of the FDA Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research, is suggesting the need for even more boosters.

For the Covid-19 injection compliant, this would mean a fifth or sixth shot of a product that has still not been FDA approved. There is no FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine available today in the United States and there are no plans to make one available. All Covid-19 vaccines are under Emergency Use Authorization with no FDA approval.

Again, there is no longterm science on the potential harms of additional Covid-19 vaccine doses or the side effects of vaccine ingredients combining and reacting in the human body. Furthermore, we still don’t know what’s in the Covid-19 injection. Why aren’t the ingredients known to the public? I mean if they want people to take so many of them….

You have a decision to make

Will you stay on the Pharma booster merry-go-round? Is it worth the risk?

On June 25, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration added a warning to patient and provider fact sheets for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines to inform the public that there was a risk of myocarditis and pericarditis after taking the vaccine.

The one-size-fits-all, global, experimental, zero-liability, often mandated Covid-19 vaccination program, that began in December 2020, is monitored in the U.S. by the CDC and FDA through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). As reports of myocarditis and pericarditis after Covid-19 vaccination escalated, cardiologists raised concerns that these mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines were associated with acute myocarditis. Sadly, their concerns have been supported by scores of recently published research articles linking the Covid-19 vaccine to the onset of myocarditis and pericarditis (see, for example, studies here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).

Myocarditis, according to an article in The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) titled “Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021” by Matthew Oster, et. al, is an inflammatory condition of the heart muscle that presents clinically from mild symptoms to severe heart failure that requires heart transplantation or leads to death. In this JAMA study, those who got myocarditis after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine had a median age of 21 years (IQR, 16-31 years), the median time of the onset of their symptoms was 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days) after receiving a Covid-19 shot. Oster, et. al drew their data from VAERS and found males comprised 82% of the myocarditis cases for those whose sex was reported. This isn’t the first time vaccination has triggered myocarditis, the smallpox vaccine has also been causally associated with myocarditis based on research from US military personnel.

As you can see in the VAERS chart below, after Covid-19 vaccination, there have been 37,579 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis reported to VAERS through March 25th, 2022 and 26,396 reported deaths overall.

Myocarditis and pericarditis are but two of 1,291 potential side effects from the Pfizer Covid-19 injection. The only reason we now know about the 1,291 potential side effects from the Pfizer Covid-19 shot is because the first batch of of FDA documents were released on March 1st in response to a Freedom of Information Act request made in August 2021 from Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. Aaron Siri, a lawyer familiar with the case, explains the documents the FDA relied upon to green-light Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine license are only now beginning to become available to the public due to a federal judge’s order. Initially, the FDA fought to delay the release of the Pfizer documents for 75 years but a federal judge mandated the documents be released within eight months. There are now 150 Pfizer Covid-19 documents available to the public here. The documents were part of the court-ordered release of 340,000 pages of documentation submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Pfizer in its application for Emergency Use Authorization of its vaccine.

Update: On April 1st, the FDA released 11,000 pages of Pfizer documents.

See current VAERS data:

VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System that began to collect vaccine injury data in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system estimated to account for only 1% of vaccine injuries ( see the Lazarus Report). OpenVAERS is created from the Health and Human Services data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov.

The OpenVAERS Project allows the public to browse and search all of the reports: click this link to browse all Covid-19 vaccine injury reports.

Do you trust Pfizer?

Pfizer’s “painkiller” Bextra was finally pulled from the market in 2005 due to safety concerns. In September 2009, Pfizer was given the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States at that time for misbranding Bextra with “the intent to defraud or mislead.” The amount of the criminal fine imposed on Pfizer was $2.3 billion. That’s billion with a “B.” In this lawsuit, Pfizer pled guilty to misbranding the painkiller Bextra. Pfizer knew Bextra was dangerous because they had conducted two studies that showed heart bypass surgery patients taking Bextra had a higher risk of stroke and heart attack. The government also argued that Pfizer additionally promoted three other drugs illegally: the antipsychotic Geodon, an antibiotic Zyvox, and the antiepileptic drug Lyrica.

The largest fine ever imposed in the United States was then upped in 2012 by another pharmaceutical company when GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) agreed to pay $3 billion in criminal and civil charges for the unlawful promotion of drugs like Paxil and Wellbutrin for uses that weren’t FDA approved. However, Pfizer still holds the record for receiving the largest criminal fine in history.

Big Pharma, big litigation: The case of Prempro

Pfizer’s drug Prempro, advertised as a hormone replacement therapy for women, was found to increase the risk of breast cancer, among many other harmful and fatal side effects. Pfizer is expected to pay approximately $1.2 billion to settle Prempro lawsuits.

There have been over 10,000 Prempro lawsuits filed against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals (the subsidiary of Pfizer that manufacturers Prempro) due to reports that this hormone replacement therapy (HRT) drug causes side effects (some fatal), including: blood clots, breast cancer, endometrial cancer (a uterine cancer), gallbladder disease, heart attack, increased breast density (some researchers argue this may increase the risk of breast cancer), ovarian cancer, pulmonary embolism (blood clots in the lungs that impede breathing and can be fatal), and stroke.

The dangers associated with Prempro gained national attention when the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) announced it was stopping a Prempro clinical study because there was overwhelming evidence the study itself was severely harming the health of women subjects due to the side effects of Prempro. In the 2002 study, conducted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), it was determined that Prempro and similar drugs significantly increased the risk of stroke, blood clots, heart attacks and breast cancer. The NIH canceled the study, citing risk to the study’s participants. The 2002 study findings have been replicated in other hormone replacement therapy studies.

Pfizer agreed to settle Prempro lawsuits filed on behalf of the 10,000 women who argued they developed breast cancer as a result of taking Prempro. Many Prempro trials resulted in multi-million dollar awards with larger punitive damage awards after juries determined that Pfizer’s subsidiary Wyeth deliberately hid the risk of breast cancer from women prescribed Prempro.

On July 24, 2012, for example, an appeals court ruled that a jury properly decided that Pfizer must pay $10.4 million to compensate Audey Singleton, who developed breast cancer after taking Prempro and sued Pfizer, because she argued the company minimized the risks of the side effects associated with Prempro. Pfizer appealed. A three-judge panel reviewed the jury’s decision and agreed with them that the amount was reasonable, stating Pfizer’s “’concerted effort to misdirect physicians from the dangers of Prempro illustrates the consciousness that its conduct was not at all reasonable.”

Unfortunately, Pfizer’s drug Prempro is still on the market. Doctors still prescribe it to women. The only difference is that now, in really, really small font to protect Pfizer from future Prempro lawsuits, patient and provider fact sheets citing potential side effects have ballooned in length. Buyer beware! Get out your magnifying glass for informed consent.

Big Pharma sold heartburn drug Zantac for 40 years knowing it caused cancer - class action lawsuits starting now

On April Fools Day, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced all manufacturers of Zantac (for heartburn), including Pfizer, must withdraw their prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) ranitidine drugs (Zantac is the commercial label for ranitidine) from the market immediately. This decision was (finally) made because the cancer causing contaminant N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is in ranitidine/Zantac medications.

According to C. Michael White, in his article “Understanding and Preventing (N-Nitrosodimethylamine) NDMA Contamination of Medications,” N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is a hepatotoxic agent and carcinogen contaminant found in many medications such as valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and ranitidine (Zantac). NDMA, according to White, can be “produced during manufacture, introduced from contaminated ingredients procured elsewhere, or introduced from contaminated solvents and catalysts.”

Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Boehringer are about to meet their cancer victims as they face class-action lawsuits from people who developed cancer after taking their product Zantac. Plaintiffs are pursuing claims on behalf of over 100,000 people who took Zantac to reduce their heartburn.

Brent Wisner will be representing the plaintiffs. Wisner is “arguably is the best lawyer in the country” according to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (himself no legal slouch) in a recent podcast. Kennedy would know, he and Wisner worked together during the landmark lawsuit Dewayne Johnson v. Monsanto Company. This was the first Roundup cancer lawsuit that proceeded to trial; the jury awarded groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson $289.2 million for the pain and suffering caused by using the product Roundup. With this win behind him, Wisner will now focus his time on the Zantac Lawsuit.

In a recent article in Children’s Health Defense, Wisner pointed out that Zantac “was sold for decades with the knowledge that NDMA caused harm.” Wisner stressed: “We’re talking 40 years they sold this product and they knew it. And we have the documents. … I mean, we have documents where they straight up say, ‘this stuff causes this cancer.’” Wisner points out that “NDMA is a very, very potent human carcinogen discovered in the 1930s in the development of rocket fuel” (emphasis mine). He emphasizes that NDMA serves no purpose in the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals or improving people’s health. Wisner reveals that Zantac is “used in laboratory experiments to induce cancer in animals” (emphasis mine). The cancers that NDMA are likely to cause, according to Wisner, include: breast, liver, stomach, bladder, prostate, as well as colorectal cancer.

Bret Wisner and his team of attorneys at Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman plan to hold the makers of Zantac accountable for concealing the link between taking Zantac and getting cancer. They will argue that Zantac manufacturers have known for decades that the ranitidine in Zantac produces staggering amounts of carcinogenic NDMA when taken as directed. Pharmaceutical companies could have warned people about the Zantac cancer risk but instead chose profits over people.

If you knew heartburn-reducing Zantac could cause cancer, would you take it? Probably not.

In conclusion:

Pfizer is one of the largest criminal organizations on Earth. Since the year 2000, Pfizer has paid over $10 billion in penalty fines for violations for which they have been caught. Only Pfizer knows what additional crimes it has gotten away with.

Do you believe that Pfizer (or, Moderna), who have ZERO-LIABILITY due to the PREP Act, cares if you or your family members are harmed or die after getting one (or four?) of their Covid-19 injections? ALL the risk from taking an experimental, mRMA Covid-19 vaccine is on YOU. Pharma gets your tax dollars but is not responsible to you, your family members, or friends financially if anyone has a bad reaction or dies from a Covid-19 vaccine. Sounds like Russian roulette to me.

(Remember, if you are under age 69, you have a 99.41% chance of surviving the Covid-19 virus without taking the experimental, zero-liability Covid-19 jab.)

Are you going to risk your health and life, or the health and life of your family members, on an experimental, zero-liability drug from a criminal pharmaceutical drug cartel?

Do you believe that Pfizer or Moderna puts you and your children’s health ahead of their profits? Wake up.

More Links: 

To see Pfizer's accountability track record, read its Corporate Rap Sheet here.

To learn more about Pfizer’s criminal misconduct, see its entry in the Project On Government Oversight's Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.

To learn about subsidies/financial assistance that Pfizer receives from federal, state and local government agencies, see the link here.